RAG in production
Indexing, re-ranking, citations and answer evaluation over your real documents.
RAG when knowledge must stay current and citations matter. Fine-tuning when style, language or a narrow skill doesn't fit in context. Hybrid when both are true.
Slash Digital Lab chooses between LLM fine-tuning and RAG by your constraints, not by recipe. If your data changes daily, RAG. If tone or format must be yours, fine-tuning. If compliance requires keeping knowledge in-house, local inference with open models.
Read the full criterion in Fine-tuning vs RAG and how we choose models in How we choose a model. For private, self-hosted AI: how to size your own AI server and open-weight models in 2026.
The cheapest path that meets the quality bar; the rest is consultant margin.
Indexing, re-ranking, citations and answer evaluation over your real documents.
LoRA adapters for style, format or narrow skills; no money burned on what RAG already solves.
Test sets from your real cases and cost/quality comparison across routes.
Data residency, local inference or VPC when compliance requires it.
Data, languages, budget and compliance: the frame before the model.
We test the best generic model; that's the yardstick everything else must beat.
RAG and/or adapters over the baseline with comparable metrics and cost per run.
The cheapest route that meets the bar, documented. If none exists, we say so.
| Constraint analysis | Data, language, budget and compliance, in writing. |
|---|---|
| Baseline | The best generic model evaluated on your cases. |
| Experiment | RAG and adapters with comparable metrics and cost. |
| Recommendation | The chosen route with estimated cost and risks. |
| Implementation | A production pipeline if you decide to continue. |
| Documentation | The criterion, documented and shareable. |
When the problem is missing or changing knowledge: RAG solves that cheaper and safer.
Yes, including local inference with GLM, Qwen, Mistral and others when compliance requires it.
It's scoped in sprints; discovery sets the size. Write to us with your case.
We explicitly evaluate your business Spanish; it's one of the lab's axes.
When style must be yours and knowledge must be current: adapters for tone, RAG for the data.
Real examples from your case, reviewed by an expert and anonymized when they contain personal data; your cases also become the test set. First we write down your data, language, budget and compliance constraints, because RAG often solves the problem with less cost and risk.
Not necessarily. If compliance requires keeping knowledge in-house, we use open models with local inference, in your VPC or on your own hardware. And client prompts are never published: only the method and findings go to /insights/.
Serving the model, usage-based or on a dedicated GPU, and maintaining it: when the base model is retired or you change vendor, a new training and evaluation cycle follows. That's why we compare the cost and quality of each route, RAG or adapters, before recommending one.
Our lab where we evaluate models and publish the method.
Learn more→ AIApplied AI for real operations: agents, RAG, vision, voice and automation.
Learn more→ Agents and engineeringWhen RAG, when fine-tuning and when a hybrid: the decision order before paying for any training.
Learn more→ ConsultingDiagnosis and architecture before building. Actionable roadmaps.
Learn more→Tell us your challenge. We reply within 24 business hours with an honest first read: if we can help, we'll say how; if not, we'll say who can.
I reply personally. No endless forms, no canned replies.